The Christian bias of the World's Media was clearly exposed when the newspapers and TV orignally blamed the massacre of over 70 young people on Utoya Island on Moslem extremists. It was, they said, a Mumbai copycat operation. But when the police captured Anders Behring Breivik, hours later, he was in the process of coolly and systematically hunting down and shooting dead his defenceless victims. The police were expecting a troop of well-armed and trained Moslem extremists but instead caught a single blond-haired blue-eyed Norwegian Christian who had set himself up for martyrdom in what he hoped would be a tipping point in a new Crusade against Islam and the 'ungodly' socialists who had 'ruined' his country.
Breivik believes there is a concerted attempt to undermine Christian belief and culture in favour of a global multiculturalism designed to destroy Western Christianity.
The world's media rapidly switched boats in mid-stream, re-portraying Breivik as a mad Nazi but how much of this is true and how much of it is to keep the truth hidden?
Breivik believes Moslem fundamentalists are using the power-vacuum created by the Socialisticas to begin a surreptitious war against Christianity and take over the West using a development of the tactics that the Soviet's used in the Cold War to infiltrate, undermine and destabilise, entire continents.
The Moslem intention, he wrote, was to impose Islamic law through religious struggle (Jihad) whilst the West was occupied with the 'sleeping sickness' of socialism.
To Breivik this was simply a re-run of the Moslem Expansionism which caused the Crusades. History was repeating itself and, according to his 'manifesto', Breivik thinks that the people responsible for this destruction of Norway was the Norwegian Labour Party with it's links to the international socialist movement and its intentions to socially-engineer a multicultural globalisation epitomised by the 1971 Coca-Cola advert which depicted a multitude of races and people holding hands on a hill-top.
I'd like to teach the world to sing
In perfect harmony
I'd like to hold it in my arms
And keep it company
(That's the song I hear)
I'd like to see the world for once
(Let the world sing today)
All standing hand in hand
And hear them echo through the hills
For peace throughout the land
That's the song I hear
(That's the song I hear)
Let the world sing today
(Let the whole wide world keep singing)
A song of peace that echoes on
And never goes away
Coca-Cola Politics
Breivik exposes 'Coca-Cola Politics' (the term has nothing to do with the company of the same name but reflects the political aim of penetrating disparate cultures to promote a single unified global idea which promises peace and happiness to all based on trite assumptions) by a very detailed analysis of key writings, rare publications and psychological discoveries by eminent and influential people in the pre and post-war Communist Intelligentsia which revealed a strategy of placing agent provocateurs within the educational establishments of countries to reform the culture through clever hidden methods of indoctrination.Breivik maintains that the Communists came to the conclusion that committed Christian Societies were highly resistant to being undermined by the usual tactics which Communism used to destabilise third world countries and that methods and ideologies would need to be put in place which would work progressively over the long-term to breach the mores and principles of Christian societies and replace them with eclectic ideals which would weaken the country and its people. Breivik maintains that these mechanisms have developed their own momentum and continued to work unseen long after the fall of communism, producing, for example, the current ideological mindset of political correctness which often goes entirely against common sense but which is behind many new laws which sound useful but eventually weaken society.
Among Marxists, Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new “Communist man” had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society’s institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals. (EDI: page 15)Breivik then goes on to show that much of what passes for modern psychotherapy is in fact a form of dependency which has its origins within these 'hidden mechanisms' which have been unknowingly intimately accepted by the West.
In 1923, Lukacs and other Marxist intellectuals associated with the Communist Party of Germany founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University in Frankfurt, Germany. The Institute, which became known as the Frankfurt School, was modelled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. In 1933, when Nazis came to power in Germany, the members of the Frankfurt School fled. Most came to the United States. The members of the Frankfurt School conducted numerous studies on the beliefs, attitudes and values they believed lay behind the rise of National Socialism in Germany. The Frankfurt School’s studies combined Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis to criticise the bases of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism.This is why Breivik specifically chose the Norwegian Labour Party Youth Summer-Camp. His intention was to kill the entire next generation of Labour Party politicians in the hope of averting further multiculturalism. As the internet establishes itself as a largely uncensored platform for the discussion of difficult subjects which would otherwise simply be suppressed, people are finding the balance of power shifting away from Mass Media which is becoming increasingly irrelevant. Real debates are ensuing, not between politicians (who are trained to obfuscate), but between real people who are finding somewhere to air their grievances. This is creating revolutions both intellectually and materially, bypassing both the censorship of information by the media and the increasingly turgid old-style political systems which seem incapable of reform.
These criticisms, known collectively as Critical Theory, were reflected in such works of the Frankfurt School as Erich Fromm’s Escape from Freedom and The Dogma of Christ, Wilhelm’s Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism and Theodor Adorno’s The Authoritarian Personality.
The Authoritarian Personality, published in 1950, substantially influenced Western European psychologists and social scientists. The book was premised on one basic idea, that the presence in a society of Christianity, capitalism, and the patriarchal-authoritarian family created a character prone to racial and religious prejudice and German fascism. The Authoritarian Personality became a handbook for a national campaign against any kind of prejudice or discrimination on the theory that if these evils were not eradicated, another Holocaust might occur on the European continent. This campaign, in turn, provided a basis for Political Correctness.
The 'Arab Spring' is a classic illustration of this effect. The Media surf these new movements, acting as commentators, as though trying to insist they are still in charge of public opinion, but people who know have long-since turned to the internet for proper information. The demise of the world's Media is closely linked to the technological improvements in computer processor speeds and memory storage capacity. Soon this will exceed the level required for instantaneous real-time streamed communication and the Media as we now know it will be a spent force.
Blond Hair, Blue Eyes, White Skinned, Steely Stare
When they got to know that the killer was a white man, shock-waves reverberated through the western media, long controlled by left-wing agents of influence. Opinion formers began to realise that beneath Breivik's terrible actions lay confirmation of a seismic shift in world politics. It was paramount that the Media continued to keep the masses asleep and aligned with the way they wanted the world to be. Their stock in trade is repetitive; - use age-old stereotypes and discords to tell the people what to think and then incite them to act to perpetrate the status quo. So their propaganda machine trundled into action yet again. They assured everyone that Anders Behring Breivik is just another lone nut, a far-right Neo-Nazi madman whose philosophies and justifications are an aberation. Breivik. they said, is just a psychopathic monster whose crimes meant nothing in the larger scheme of things. He was termed delusional and insane. His actions were one of those random acts of violence that could not be predicted and which will probably never happen again now that he had been caught; they said. Oh... that's all right then... But is it?.Commentators who are indoctrinated with the usual Xist perspectives did not bother to look further into Breivik's real motives but wrote him off instantly. Some even tried to wipe his name from history.
Presumably he wanted to make a name for himself, which is why I won't identify him. His name deserves to be forgotten. Discarded. Deleted. Labels like "madman", "monster", or "maniac" won't do, either. There's a perverse glorification in terms like that. If the media's going to call him anything, it should call him pathetic; a nothing. Source: Charlie Booker, Film Critic, The Guardian.But nothing could be further from the truth and it is as unwise to try to ignore what Breivik has done as it would have been to try to ignore the crimes of other mass murderers such as Michael Ryan, Derek Bird or Thomas Hamilton. Breivik is not a fool nor is he a mad Nazi. And you should worry.
Breivik is a well-educated, well-read, successful intellectual with a high-IQ. The photograph (right) is from his published diary of him attending his sister's wedding. He comes from a liberal intellectual middle-class family (his father was a diplomat). Breivik had worked in many key positions in large conglomerates in the USA and Europe and started a business in IT which earned him millions by the time he was in his mid-twenties. He is well-travelled and personable, has many friends and can mix socially easily. He is not a sad lonely prat, neither is he a dysfunctional madman. It is easy for the Media propaganda machine to dismiss Breivik as a nut but his story is intensely crucial to the future of the West and we hope that in laying it out here it will avoid the confrontation that may be coming.
No Excuses For a Psychopathic Killer
Now at the outset I want to say that what Breivik did was horrendous and inexcusable. To cut short the lives of so many promising young people from the Norwegian intelligentsia in such a cold and clinical way is an abomination and there is absolutely no rationale which could justify his actions. I utterly and unreservedly condemn him and send my sincere sympathies to the relatives of his victims. However, if Breivik is more than a madman, which he is, then society needs to look carefully at what caused him to do those atrocious things because my warning for those who think it began and ended with him is that writing Anders Breivik off as another Oswald may cause more innocents to die in the long run.The European Declaraton of Independence (EDI)
In Breivik's 'manifesto', grandly titled the European Declaration of Independence ( which you can read in full (courtesy of Kevin Slaughter), here) Breivik lays out a cogent and highly persuasive history of the conflicts between Christianity and Islam. He has a cultured, well-informed intellect. Apart from a consistent imperious style related to claims about his newly formed Crusade, the Pauper Soldiers of Christ, Knights Templars of Solomon (De Laude Novae Militiae Pauperes commilitones Christie Templique Solomonici) which likely indicate delusions of grandeur, the 1518 pages of his European Declaration of Independence (EDI) are written in an accessible and personable style. This is his political 'manifesto' for change - a rallying cry to Christians in the West. Please note the Crusader Cross emblazoned on the front cover. In his EDI Breivik introduces his family and tells about his personal growth and the illuminations which brought him to his current views. It will be both compelling and believable to millions. Particularly to right-wing Christian militia types many of whom are beginning to see Breivik as a martyr to the Christian cause.In particular Breivik's ideas and philosophy dangerously melds the previously unconnected right-wing factions of the U.S. with the Conservative Militia in the Balkans, where incandescent grudges still exist in the minds of millions of Christians there about the way Europe interferred in their conflicts in favour of the Moslems.
Breivik's EDI includes his personal story. Of how he tried to change things from within the system (he stood as Progress Party Candidate at the Oslo city council elections in 2003) and had first hand experience of the inability of the present process to reflect anything but 'Coca-Cola politics'. It was after this that he moved towards radical political action. The Pauper Soldiers of Christ, Knights Templars of Solomon (PCCTS) was founded by him and, he claims, other leading members of the 'Conservative Revolutionary Movement'. Investigations by the authorities have so far played down this claim. Is this megalomania? The usual divine justification for immoral acts he knew he might have to undertake later? Or are right-wing factions really coming together all over Europe?
Burn The Witch!
Of course, Breivik's clear Christian motivation has already been re-presented and demonised by the fawning Xist press as having occult connections. It is SO easy for them to press the buttons of Joe Public using propaganda stereotypes which they have indoctrinated people with over the centuries, yet Breivik is without doubt not only a committed Christian but his entire radical philosophy and justification for killing over 70 innocent people is based squarely and irrevocably on his Christian beliefs and Christian history. This point will be hotly refuted by the fundies who have already tried to link Breivik with Satanic practices linked to Human Sacrifice and the New World Order myth (see leftmost column). The truth is that there are 2466 mentions of christianity in Breivik's EDI, all supportive and often using the pronoun 'us' to include the white european Christian lobby.To make the fact absolutely clear we have appended some quotations from Breivik's EDI and diary which, in his own words, clearly state his motivation to kill as being to uphold and protect the Christian religion. We are not here suggesting that ALL believers in Christianity think this way. Most Christians will , rightly, utterly condemn Breivik's crimes
We reproduce Breivik's pro-Christian statements below to show
(1) He is a Christian and not an occultist, satanist or devil worshipper.
(2) He is not alone in this thinking:
There are hundreds of thousands; even millions of Christians throughout the West who DO believe in many of the things Breivik has concluded. Trying to pass Breivik off as non-mainstream will not silence these people who will see anything but truthful dealing as further proof of their fears. They are more likely to be radicalised if his crimes are blamed on occultists and emerging Christian militarism is ignored. It is vitally important to get this truth across to politicians and opinion formers because they can do more than anyone to avoid the coming conflict.
BREIVIK'S CHRISTIAN CREDENTIALS
How Breivik consciously chose to Convert to Christianity
My parents, being rather secular wanted to give me the choice in regards to religion. At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I consider myself to be 100% Christian. However, I strongly object to the current suicidal path of the Catholic Church but especially the Protestant Church. I support a Church that believes in self defence and who are willing to fight for its principles and values, at least resist the efforts put forth to exterminate it gradually. The Catholic and Protestant Church are both cheering their own annihilation considering the fact that they embrace the ongoing inter-faith dialogue and the appeasement of Islam. The current Church elite has shown its suicidal face, as vividly demonstrated last year by the archbishop of Canterbury's speech contemplating the legitimacy of Shariah in parts of Britain. (EDI: Page 1403)
Breivik's Criticisms of The Church and Plans for the future of Christianity in Europe
I trust that the future leadership of a European cultural conservative hegemony in Europe will ensure that the current Church leadership are replaced and the systems somewhat reformed. WE MUST HAVE A CHURCH LEADERSHIP WHO SUPPORTS A FUTURE CRUSADE WITH THE INTENTION OF LIBERATING THE BALKANS, ANATOLIA AND CREATING THREE CHRISTIAN STATES IN THE MIDDLE EAST. Efforts should be made to facilitate the de-construction of the Protestant Church whose members should convert back to Catholicism. The Protestant Church had an important role once but its original goals have been accomplished and have contributed to reform the Catholic Church as well. Europe should have a united Church lead by a just and non-suicidal Pope who is willing to fight for the security of his subjects, especially in regards to Islamic atrocities. I FULLY SUPPORT THAT THE CHURCH GAINS MORE OR LESS MONOPOLY ON RELIGION IN EUROPE (GOVERNMENT POLICIES, SCHOOL CURRICULUM ETC AT LEAST) in addition to granting the Church several concessions which have been taken from them the last decades. (EDI: Page 1403)
Breivik communes with God for Spiritual Insight into his anti-Moslem Crusade
I prayed for the first time in a very long time today. I explained to God that unless he wanted the Marxist-Islamic alliance and the certain Islamic takeover of Europe to completely annihilate European Christendom within the next hundred years he must ensure that the warriors fighting for the preservation of European Christendom prevail. He must ensure that I succeed with my mission and as such; contribute to inspire thousands of other revolutionary conservatives/nationalists; anti- Communists and anti-Islamists throughout the European world. (EDI; page 1459) Our primary objective is to develop PCCTS, Knights Templar into becoming the foremost conservative revolutionary movement in Western Europe the next few decades. This in relation to developing a new type of European nationalism referred to as Crusader Nationalism. (EDI; page 1414)
Breivik sees himself as saviour of European Christendom
I will always know that I am perhaps the biggest champion of cultural conservatism, Europe has ever witnessed since 1950. I am one of many destroyers of cultural Marxism and as such; a hero of Europe, a savior of our people and of European Christendom. (EDI; page 1435.) As it is through the example of Christ, the "Prince of Peace," that Christianity interprets its scriptures, so it is through the example of the warlord and despot Muhammad that Muslims understand the Quran. (EDI; Page 100)
(speaking of the right wing movement he is part of Breivik writes:)
We fight for the free indigenous peoples of Europe, for those not yet born and for the memory and wishes of our forefathers, our martyrs. We fight to preserve our culture, our identity, our country and for Christendom. (EDI; page 1412)
Breivik explains how he obtains strength from God to kill and become a martyr
I will probably arrange that just before or after I attend my final martyrs mass in Frogner Church. It will contribute to ease my mind as I imagine I will get tense and very nervous. It is easier to face death if you know you are biologically, mentally and spiritually at ease. (EDI; page 1424)But of Course Breivik did not die a Christian martyr's death. He gave himself up and was captured by the police. This has given the Norwegian government a real headache. Realising the toxic nature of Breivik's philosophies it is vital that the Socialisticas do not give him an open trial which will simply provide him with a platform to justify or rationalise his motives to the public. On no account must the public be allowed to realise that Breivik was not simply another Oswald. Thus in their wisdom the Xists amongst the ruling class have decided to try him in camera and the media are already lining up their stock-stereotypes to fall in with it and dupe the Western world.
All this will simply reinforce the radicals and create another Utoya somewhere else in Europe. Breivik has opened a fault-line within democracy in the West and few realise just what the implications are. Brushing it under the carpet is NOT the way to deal with this situation otherwise those poor kids who gave their lives for democracy will have been wasted.
He's a Christian Jim, But Not As We Know It...
Now many observers will say that Breivik's views do not represent Christians in general and I agree that is the case. They may also say that he is a megalomaniac who is intepreting the history of Christianity to suit himself but with that I cannot agree. What he says is not morally right but it is also not factually wrong. The history of the church is replete with militarist organisations, secret military societies and warrior sects. There are HUNDREDS more of them besides the well known ones like the Knights Templars, Hospitalers of St John, Soldiers of St Columbo, etc . Many of these continue today in muted form and new ones have regularly appeared in modern times, from the Salvation Army to the Jesus Army and Soldiers of Christ etc. The absolutist claims of religion has always provided a justification for people to strive to commandeer society using verbal or physical force. Why else would commissioned padres bless the machinery of war before armies go into battle?Ends:
John Freedom, Mortlake, Lammas 2011.
Particularly when you remember that Breivik is a fundamentalist Christian who has himself been influenced by the NWO myth.(see column left and below)
WE TOLD YOU SO in 1999
|
No comments:
Post a Comment